The best graphics cards for Hackintosh in 2018

Hackintosh graphics cards RX 560 and RX570

Choosing a new graphics card is never easy, but it’s even more difficult when it’s for a Hackintosh. As well as the usual price and performance considerations, you also have compatibility to think about. To help you make a decision, we’ve chosen 4 of what we consider the best Hackintosh compatible graphics cards available to buy in 2018.

AMD or Nvidia?

Mac OS X Mojave, and its predecessor High Sierra, are heavily biased in favour of AMD graphics cards. This is especially true in Apple’s own Pro apps like Final Cut Pro X, Compressor, and Apple Motion. This is mainly due to the fact that AMD graphics chips are present in all of the current Macs with discrete graphics, so drivers in OS X are heavily optimised for AMD chips. In fact, at the time of writing in 2018 it’s been 5 years since Apple shipped a new Mac containing a Nvidia GPU (the 2013 iMac).

In addition, beginning with High Sierra 10.13.4, Apple officially introduced eGPU support for the following cards –

  • AMD RX 470
  • AMD RX 480
  • AMD RX 570
  • AMD RX 580
  • Radeon Pro WX 7100
  • AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
  • AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
  • Vega Frontier Edition Air
  • Radeon Pro WX 9100

and native drivers for these cards are included in Mac OS X High Sierra 10.13.4 or later, and in 10.14 Mojave.

So, for the best compatibility, most trouble-free installation and good performance, I recommend buying AMD over Nvidia. That said, I have included one Nvidia card in this selection, as they will work in Mac OS X High Sierra using Nvidia’s Web Drivers (drivers for Mojave are yet to be released), and if you’re a gamer, they perform better in games under both Mac OS X and Windows compared to AMD cards at a similar price point.

So which one should I get?

The answer to this question depends a lot on what you want to do, whether you want to be reliant on third party drivers, and how much you have to spend. All of the cards listed in our recommended Hackintosh GPU list will perform well, but here are our four top picks.

NameVRAMPowerShading unitsTexture units
Sapphire RX 560 Pulse 4GB
Best Value
4GB80W102464
Sapphire Radeon Nitro+ RX580 8GB
Best Price-Performance
8GB185W2304144
EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Gaming 11GB
Best For Gaming
11GB250W3584224
Sapphire Nitro+ RX Vega 64 8GB
Best for Video Editing
8GB295W4096256

Sapphire RX 560 Pulse 4GB – Best Value

For a budget build, the best value card is the Sapphire RX 560 Pulse 4GB. It’s easy to get running under Mac OS X High Sierra, and works well in Final Cut Pro and Motion. This card is going to give you better performance in OS X than most of the current real Macs (apart from the high-end 27″ iMac and the iMac Pro) while costing under $200.

The power consumption is low, making it economical to run, and it’s one of the more compact cards, so is easier to install in smaller cases where space is at a premium.

Sapphire Radeon Nitro+ RX580 8GB – Best Price-Performance

If you’re willing to spend a bit more, the best bang for the buck card you can get right now for a Hackintosh is the Sapphire Radeon Nitro+ RX580 8GB. It has one of the fastest burst clocks of the available RX 580 cards, and is going to give you an excellent level of performance in OS X. It also has twice the VRAM of the cheaper 4GB cards while not costing that much more, and because it’s an AMD card you’re not reliant on Nvidia’s often buggy drivers.

It’s also a very capable gaming card, able to run current games in high or ultra details at 60fps in 1080p or 1440p with ease.

Best of all, it’s reasonably priced, considering the performance this card has to offer.

EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Gaming 11GB – Best For Gaming

If your primary focus is Windows gaming, but you want the ability to run OS X as a second OS, then the EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Gaming 11GB is head and shoulders above the other cards in gaming performance. We’re talking 4K gaming at 60+ fps in current games. It’s also a perfectly capable OS X card, using Nvidia’s drivers. In the BruceX 5K export test, it scored a very respectable 20.1 seconds, making it just a little slower than the RX 570 and RX 580.

Sapphire Nitro+ RX Vega 64 8GB – Best for Video Editing

If your main objective is building a high performance, no-compromise video editing machine for FCPX, then the best card available is the Sapphire Nitro+ RX Vega 64 8GB. The Vega 64 is the same card used in the high-end, $5600 iMac Pro (the $5000 model uses the Vega 56). So, if you want iMac Pro level performance without iMac Pro level prices, this is the card to get.

It’s also an excellent gaming card, able to run current games in high or ultra details at 60fps in up to 4K resolution.

Benchmarks

To illustrate what sort of performance you can expect from a variety of cards in Apple’s apps and in games, let’s take a look at a couple of benchmarks – Unigine Heaven 1.0 for gaming graphics and BruceX 5K for Final Cut Pro.

Unigine Valley 1.0 (Extreme HD Preset)

Intel HD 630 IGPU: 5.3 fps
2017 MacBook Pro 15″ Radeon Pro 555: 16fps
AMD RX 560 4GB: 22.9 fps
AMD RX 570 8GB: 44.1 fps
AMD RX 580 8GB: 48.3 fps
AMD RX Vega 56: 52.8 fps
AMD RX Vega 64: 69.4 fps
Nvidia GTX 1060 3GB: 56.5 fps
Nvidia GTX 1060 6GB: 63.1 fps
Nvidia GTX 1080: 88.4 fps
Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti: 96.1 fps

BruceX 5K Benchmark FCPX (Lower is better)

Intel HD 630 IGPU: 1 Minute 55 seconds
2017 MacBook Pro 15″ Radeon Pro 555: 41 seconds
AMD RX 560 4GB: 29 seconds
AMD RX 570 8GB: 17.1 seconds
AMD RX 580 8GB: 15.3 seconds
AMD RX Vega 56: 12.9 seconds
AMD RX Vega 64: 11.4 seconds
Nvidia GTX 1060 3GB: 48.2 seconds
Nvidia GTX 1060 6GB: 43 seconds
Nvidia GTX 1080: 24.3 seconds
Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti: 20.1 seconds

As can be seen from the benchmarks, even though on paper the GTX 1080 Ti is a vastly more powerful card, in the BruceX 5K export test, it’s soundly beaten by the RX 570. The RX 570 is also over twice as fast as the GTX 1060 6GB. However, for gaming the Nvidia cards win by a large margin.